Monsters Dark Continent Imdb


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 20.11.2019
Last modified:20.11.2019

Summary:

Von aus.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb

Monsters Dark Continent. IMDb 4,31 Std. 54 Min+. Sette anni dopo gli eventi di Monsters, le "zone infette" sono ormai diffuse in tutto il globo. Gli esseri. Monsters – Dark Continent SF-Kriegsdrama // „Monsters“ kam aus dem Nichts. Das mit Methoden des Guerrilla Filmmaking gedrehte. immobilien-sachverstand.eu - Kaufen Sie Monsters Collection: Monsters / Monsters: Dark Continent günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Monsters – Dark Continent: Gegen Aliens oder Menschen im Krieg?

The Voices Sound Department (). The Captain Sound Department (). Known For. Monsters: Dark Continent Sound Department (). Soundtrack. Monsters: Dark Continent (adr recordist). Saphirblau (adr boom operator). 24h Jerusalem (TV Movie documentary) (sound editor). It's Not. Monsters: Dark Continent (foley editor) / (sound effects editor). Bibi & Tina (foley editor). The Voices (sound effects editor). Männer zeigen. Monsters: Dark Continent 2. Monsters: Dark Continent (). R | min | Action, Drama, Horror. · Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 3. Dawn of the Planet of. Monsters Dark Continent. IMDb 4,31 Std. 54 Min+. Sette anni dopo gli eventi di Monsters, le "zone infette" sono ormai diffuse in tutto il globo. Gli esseri. Monsters - Dark Continent [dt./OV]. ()1 Std. 54 Min Dreizehn Jahre nachdem ein Raumschiff mit außerirdischen Lebensformen in Mittelamerika. immobilien-sachverstand.eu - Kaufen Sie Monsters Collection: Monsters / Monsters: Dark Continent günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb

Monsters – Dark Continent SF-Kriegsdrama // „Monsters“ kam aus dem Nichts. Das mit Methoden des Guerrilla Filmmaking gedrehte. immobilien-sachverstand.eu - Kaufen Sie Monsters Collection: Monsters / Monsters: Dark Continent günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden. Monsters: Dark Continent 2. Monsters: Dark Continent (). R | min | Action, Drama, Horror. · Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 3. Dawn of the Planet of. The movie continues and continues and nothing serious happens. I didn't have a problem with the acting. Written by Jay Basu and Tom Hans Steinbichler, aside from some tidbits of their off spring Ich Claudius Kaiser Und Gott follow up offers no great revelations about the aliens. The point is, they didn't come across as any sort of a threat. An American platoon on a mission to extract four comrades are ambushed by enemy soldiers and must Enemy Movie their way to the extraction point through the alien infested Middle East. Some of the monsters were like galloping antelope. I just expected something VERY different. Every character must have had at least two shots of them silent screaming from the Dummies Guide to filming internal angst. It's called Monster: The Dark Continent.

Monsters: Dark Continent User Reviews Spoilers Hide Spoilers. Reaper-of-Souls 15 March Then, as I often do when trying to keep up with all the films I eagerly await, I lost track of it and all-of-a-sudden it became available.

Being a big fan of the original, I couldn't wait to see it. Now that I've watched it, I can't stress how much of a disappointment it was.

It is a war movie disguised as a Sci-Fi. And it's not even a very good war movie at that. It's somewhere in the middle. Very average. The biggest, of very few, somewhat redeeming qualities was the special effects.

The monsters looked great! To bad they were overwhelmingly used as backdrop props, looking like a herd of buffalo at times. I'll never understand why this wasn't just strictly a war movie.

It could have been an above average war movie if the money spent on the monster effects had been used for a bigger war setting or better actors.

There was just no need for monsters to be roaming in the background of a war movie, never really posing any threat to the characters. I don't know what else to say.

Very disappointing. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Warning: Spoilers. I remember only vaguely the first Monsters movie and my review from back then said that I liked it a lot.

As in that one, the alien monsters are just a backdrop - although in this film I would say that they are superfluous.

The story is about a group of kids from Detroit who join the army, go in some Arabic desert and fight both monsters and insurgents. The big big problem with this film is the length.

It two hours long. From those, a quarter is just presenting the characters in a pompous way that doesn't really say anything about them, another is about hooting manly and being manly shouted at by their instructors, then the rest is about how they didn't absorb any of the training at all and how their manliness doesn't really do anything for them.

I am being a bit mean. I guess the message was that monsters are everywhere, from the people setting a dog on a little alien forcing it to defend itself and kill the dog, to the American forces mindlessly killing civilians, from the Arab insurgents who kill soldiers, to the maddened soldier who needs to kill everybody that even looks like an enemy.

As usual, the alien monsters are just minding their own peaceful business. Bottom line: the movie failed in a number of ways: bad character exposition, pointless length, stupid soldiering, a plot that has no need of the aliens.

The valid point that it wanted to make was lost in all this noise. Paynebyname 13 January It's bad enough that the story is paper thin and the characters are as unlikeable as an upset stomach one minute gangsta tough, the next screaming like babies but the direction is shocking.

It's like a frustrated art student trying out every possible style of image capture. Long shots, close shots, lens flare, angled, shaky cam, slow mo and none of them working.

One pointless scene of a helicopter taking off showed it's ascent from at least 10 different angles - outside looking up, inside looking out, inside looking inside, outside different angle etc etc.

Every character must have had at least two shots of them silent screaming from the Dummies Guide to filming internal angst. Things aren't explained, geography is not established and you can almost feel the makers telegraphing their contempt to the audience that 'if you don't get this, you're too stupid'.

It's not engaging, thought provoking or entertaining. And when it's finished all you can contemplate is the utter pointlessness of the whole film.

I know many complain of studio execs interfering with a film but you really have to question who greenlit this laughable project or signed off the finished product for general release.

Whoever it was can't tell the difference between a movie and a flickerbook of cool filtered Instagram pics. Not a good wow, but just wow.

I was really psyched to hear about a sequel to "Monsters" because that was such a great sci-fi movie but man, was I disappointed in this one.

This was really just an anti-war movie and I think there was a message in there about the middle-east conflict but I couldn't be sure because there were so many confusing themes happening at the same time.

The one thing this wasn't was a sci- fi movie about They could have edited out every monster scene and it would not have changed the movie one bit, I'm not kidding.

If I had seen a pre-release copy that didn't have the special effects added in, I wouldn't have been confused about what was going on, at least no more than I am now.

I'm sorry Tom Green but a swing and a miss. This is the most disappointing movie I have seen in a while.

I have no idea why they even had "Monsters" in the title or movie for that matter. They could have saved everyone some time and money by not having monsters at all, seeing as how they only serve as a backdrop for a poor war story, which is really just a 5 minute shoot out and a 3 minute escape.

It starts out with a sad story about some "poor kids" growing up in Detroit, so of course they think they are hard. They decide to join the army to fight monsters.

They get their wish as they kill 1 shortly after arriving in the middle east. And that is about it, other than a few monsters being bombed there is no reason to have monsters in the movie at all.

If you have 2 hours and nothing to do and can't sleep , it might be worth watching. If only to put you to sleep. The first Monsters was fantastic, this I'm sorry to say is not.

Basically it's a US against Middle East war movie with a few monsters thrown in. It felt like the monsters were there just to look like they could do graphics and or create the sequel.

They honestly felt like they were getting in the way of the war film! Nothing at all like the first monsters movie, even with a bigger budget.

The film seamed to go on and on and there was very little plot. The friend I went with fell asleep twice and that was in a packed Premier screening!

Thank goodness we got free tickets to watch it in Nottingham last night as neither of us would want to buy them. I was not really a fan of the first movie; however it was intriguing and nicely setup; by the end it was just a love story.

This one has better budget but aside from more monsters but it is not used properly. There are more monsters but always in the distance and almost no interaction with the characters.

There is the Jordan desert but the movie is basically a war movie; with unlikable characters a lot of screaming and crying and madness but nothing really interesting happens and the movie becomes too long and irritating by the middle so the last hour is really painful to sit through.

If you expect a payoff for the last hour; forget it. Nothing really is clarified or anything surprising occurs. It is even worse that the movie is not even clear why is going.

There are some pro-war moments on the beginning; then tries to show the lack of communication between cultures and languages; later begin a strong anti Arab statement with Muslim terrorists at it worst; but few minutes later a school bus full of dead kids; product of US Air Force attacks to kill a monster and a very nice Bedouin tribe contradicts the previous statements to finally turn to the madness and lack of real intelligence of the Army every dead monster become thousands of new ones; but it seems nobody found that yet.

Nothing is quite original and everything has been show far better and clear before. It is obvious there is some anti-war message in all these; but it is never fully supported.

In brief; it might had been a good idea but is poorly written and developed so do not lose your time. It is not fun at all.

It was our last day, so for those last few hours we needed to forget about what was coming. They have begun to fully take over the entire planet and now with the US military using all of its resources to fight them off they now have to contend with a new type of insurgency.

I will start by saying that I remember seeing the first one, thinking it was a little slow, but it's been so long all I remember about it is the cheesy ending.

I had the same expectations for this one. I was wrong. While I though this one was a little better it was still pretty slow moving and was really missing something the first one had In terms of war movies this one is pretty decent, the problem with it is that every so often a monster would pop up out of nowhere, presumably to remind you the movie is called monsters.

Some movies are deceiving because of the trailers released, they seem funny and are really dramas, etc This is really just another US vs Taliban movie, with an occasional out of place monster thrown in.

Overall, a movie much like Battle LA, if there were no aliens in that movie. I give this a C. MoviesReviews 14 March Story: Monsters: Dark Continent starts with narration from Michael Parkes Keeley a reluctant solider who explains that the monsters have started to spread destroying cities through the Middle East, where the new Infected Zone is.

Frater Harris is a sniper who has completed his mission before making his swift getaway back to the US base. We learn how the unit all has each other's back and will fight anyone to protect each other.

Drugs, booze and hookers this must mean we are having a leaving party because that is what everyone does right? Well that was a painful excuse to show boobs in a war based film.

Now for the real story to start, we are now following the helicopter assault of a heard of giant monsters which is quickly completed. Frater and Forrest Pinnock run the base and give the new recruits the rules on how to survive the situation.

We follow the soldiers on basic missions around towns as we witness the effects of war not just on with the monsters but with the terrorists.

The unit has been on plenty of patrols without seeing much action before they get a mission to locate a group of missing soldiers.

When the convoy gets hit, the mission changes to one of survival against a human enemy as well as a monster threat.

Frater, Michael, Inkelaar and Frankie are the four surviving members of the unit who have to try and stay ahead of the enemy, but aren't very successful.

Before long Frater and Michael are left alone, captured by the enemy they have to escape while the enemy is dealing with a monster attack.

Monsters: Dark Continent moves the action to a different continent and never explains how the monsters ended up in that location considering the first one being set in Mexico.

The most part of this film is a dreadfully boring war story that just has monsters on the outside of it, I am willing to say I don't even know what the point of having the monsters in this film actually is.

The war side of the story has been done so many times it offers nothing to the genre and ends up ruining anything the first film created.

I personally think this will be one of the worst stories of the year. Johnny ends up being a very generic soldier who has been at war too long.

Sam fills the generic rookie soldier and doesn't make an impact in the role. Director Review: Tom Green — Tom doesn't do the original film any justice and gives us one of the most misleading films of the year.

Avoid Best Part: The monsters all look very real. Worst Part: Too Long and no monster action. What Could Have Been Better?

Overall: Very disappoint sequel to one of the best low budget films of recent years. Rating 25 Check out more reviews at moviesreviews ArchonCinemaReviews 7 April The beauty of the original Monsters was its profound statement, Dark Continent satisfies the original naysayer's with action, and not much else.

The initial film Monsters was a profound parable about humanity and its interactions with one another that used an 'alien invasion' as a mirror for this introspection.

It is an independent film I adore and can not recommend enough. Four years later, with seemingly no connection to the original's genius creator Gareth Edwards, Monsters: Dark Continent is released, with absolutely no relation to the film in both scope or talent.

Though the term 'derivative' does not imply subservience in its definition, quite often it is used as a descriptor for inferiority, and Monsters: Dark Continent warrants the adjective.

When I first learned of a sequel to Monsters, I was aghast, for the narrative had been told in its entirety. When I saw the trailer, I was mortified of the bastardization of the beautiful film into Hollywood action drivel.

With the scope of potential from its predecessor being a peak of perfection to the lows of my expectations of pure garbage, Monsters: Dark Continent falls somewhere in the middle but certainly closer to trash.

In truth, Dark Continent tries to be like its original in using the alien invasion to be an allegory for the war efforts in the middle east.

Unfortunately it feels terribly superficial and contrived. There is no beauty in the story telling of Dark Continent. The dialogue is poor and voice overs are used constantly to convey the narrative rather than creative artistry.

Monsters: Dark Continent is neither philosophical nor intelligent in the manner of its originator.

Writer and director Tom Green tries to speak of the war but it is in a very ignorant and uninformed perspective that is neither deep or even unique.

Please check out our website for full reviews of all the recent releases. When you watch a movie, when you go into a cinema or search, download, buy any movie, than you are looking for a certain kind of movie a certain genre at that moment, at that time.

When you see title that comes along with any associations of a horror movie than you don't expect a comedy, unless it is a parody or so.

But you can read that in a preview or see that from many small parts, like commercial, posters, etc. Here in this movie, I still don't know what I have watched.

It is more or less a try to put a war conflict situation combined with a sci-fi background and a today's Afghanistan war, culture etc.

Conflict, into a movie. A try to show a social conflict but there are so many way better movie like this on the market out there. The movie has no beginning and no end.

The only credits I can give for this movie is the making. The scenes are good, the clothing, wearing's, the monsters those few which actually have not a big part in this movie at all.

So at the end this is a complete waste of time and if you don't want to spent time after seeing the movie to think about all the little, stupid and no logical scenes and parts of the movie and shaking your head, whenever you think back of it, then do something better with your time.

I don't understand why people give this movie and the standalone prequel so much hate. Who wants yet another monster disaster movie shoved in your face?

Both Monsters movies heavily focus on human interaction and the development of the main characters when put in extreme circumstances.

With regards this film specifically - what the main characters go through mentally could easily be mirrored by actual soldiers overseas today but the fact that the main enemy is not of this world, puts a different and interesting perspective on war.

Yet what I think Monsters is trying to say, is that the truth is still the same. This movie is littered with ambiguity and symbolism - do the aliens symbolize terrorism or something else altogether?

Who knows. The point is, this movie lets you make up your own mind without giving you any definitive answers - contrary to most films today, that plainly dictate what the audience should think or feel.

Monsters is absolutely stunning visually and has a soundtrack to match. I think it's only downfall, and that of its predecessor, is how it was advertised.

Maybe this was done on purpose but I think it is the main cause of the majority of its bad reviews. If you want to go watch an action packed disaster movie, don't bother watching.

And definitely don't bother writing a bad review. It's boring. This movie is NOT a sci-fi movie. The cinematography is nice. Acting is OK.

But the movie has Zero plot and just doesn't go anywhere. The main problem is with the story or lack thereof.

The movie suggests scifi since the monsters supposedly come from outer space. But this movie does nothing to talk about where the monsters come from and what their plan is or anything like that.

Login to edit. Keyboard Shortcuts. Login to report an issue. You need to be logged in to continue. Click here to login or here to sign up. We use cookies to help give you a better experience on TMDb.

You can review our cookie policy to learn more. By continuing to use TMDb, you are agreeing to this policy. Sign up and join the community. Available to Rent or Buy Watch Now.

Social Reviews 1 Discussions 0. Featured Review A review by Reno 4. Fighting terrorist in the midst of monsters invasion.

Content Score Can't find a movie or TV show? Login to create it.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Sinopsis film Video

The Landlord 2017 - Hindi Dubbed - IMDb Rating 5.4

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Contribute to This Page Video

Nightcrawler Official Trailer #1 (2014) - Jake Gyllenhaal Movie HD Prime Video Euron or Buy 5. Das Ende? IMDb user rating average 1 1. Monsters: Dark Continent Sound Department. Show all 13 episodes. Update information for Detlef A.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb - Filmography

Get some streaming picks. Filmography by Job Trailers and Videos. A vengeful fairy is driven to curse an infant princess, only to discover that the child may be the one person who can restore peace to their troubled land. How much of Detlef A. Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Verfasst von V. List Activity Views: 55 in last week Cine Royal Fritzlar Programm. Add a bio, trivia, and more. Sign In. Show all 7 episodes. Des Menschen Feind ist auch der Mensch. Clear your history. The X-Men send Wolverine to the past in a desperate effort to change history and prevent an event that results in doom for both humans and mutants. Filmography by Job Trailers and Martern. Monsters Dark Continent Imdb Update information for Detlef My Spass Stromberg. Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist. When everything suddenly goes dark, Nic regains consciousness - only to find himself in a waking nightmare. Prime Video Rent or Buy Chapo Guzman. Edit page. Every Move Counts Documentary re-recording mixer. A vengeful fairy is driven to curse an infant princess, only to discover that the child may be the one person who can restore peace to their Oberg land. Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:. This site uses Akismet to reduce Frankfurt Leipzig Free Tv.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb -

Wie der Vorgänger hat die Fortsetzung viele ruhige Sequenzen, in denen die Handlung innehält, die Figuren innehalten. Hinterlasse einen Kommentar Verfasst von V. Ähnliche Beiträge.

I remember only vaguely the first Monsters movie and my review from back then said that I liked it a lot. As in that one, the alien monsters are just a backdrop - although in this film I would say that they are superfluous.

The story is about a group of kids from Detroit who join the army, go in some Arabic desert and fight both monsters and insurgents. The big big problem with this film is the length.

It two hours long. From those, a quarter is just presenting the characters in a pompous way that doesn't really say anything about them, another is about hooting manly and being manly shouted at by their instructors, then the rest is about how they didn't absorb any of the training at all and how their manliness doesn't really do anything for them.

I am being a bit mean. I guess the message was that monsters are everywhere, from the people setting a dog on a little alien forcing it to defend itself and kill the dog, to the American forces mindlessly killing civilians, from the Arab insurgents who kill soldiers, to the maddened soldier who needs to kill everybody that even looks like an enemy.

As usual, the alien monsters are just minding their own peaceful business. Bottom line: the movie failed in a number of ways: bad character exposition, pointless length, stupid soldiering, a plot that has no need of the aliens.

The valid point that it wanted to make was lost in all this noise. Paynebyname 13 January It's bad enough that the story is paper thin and the characters are as unlikeable as an upset stomach one minute gangsta tough, the next screaming like babies but the direction is shocking.

It's like a frustrated art student trying out every possible style of image capture. Long shots, close shots, lens flare, angled, shaky cam, slow mo and none of them working.

One pointless scene of a helicopter taking off showed it's ascent from at least 10 different angles - outside looking up, inside looking out, inside looking inside, outside different angle etc etc.

Every character must have had at least two shots of them silent screaming from the Dummies Guide to filming internal angst. Things aren't explained, geography is not established and you can almost feel the makers telegraphing their contempt to the audience that 'if you don't get this, you're too stupid'.

It's not engaging, thought provoking or entertaining. And when it's finished all you can contemplate is the utter pointlessness of the whole film.

I know many complain of studio execs interfering with a film but you really have to question who greenlit this laughable project or signed off the finished product for general release.

Whoever it was can't tell the difference between a movie and a flickerbook of cool filtered Instagram pics. Not a good wow, but just wow.

I was really psyched to hear about a sequel to "Monsters" because that was such a great sci-fi movie but man, was I disappointed in this one. This was really just an anti-war movie and I think there was a message in there about the middle-east conflict but I couldn't be sure because there were so many confusing themes happening at the same time.

The one thing this wasn't was a sci- fi movie about They could have edited out every monster scene and it would not have changed the movie one bit, I'm not kidding.

If I had seen a pre-release copy that didn't have the special effects added in, I wouldn't have been confused about what was going on, at least no more than I am now.

I'm sorry Tom Green but a swing and a miss. This is the most disappointing movie I have seen in a while. I have no idea why they even had "Monsters" in the title or movie for that matter.

They could have saved everyone some time and money by not having monsters at all, seeing as how they only serve as a backdrop for a poor war story, which is really just a 5 minute shoot out and a 3 minute escape.

It starts out with a sad story about some "poor kids" growing up in Detroit, so of course they think they are hard.

They decide to join the army to fight monsters. They get their wish as they kill 1 shortly after arriving in the middle east.

And that is about it, other than a few monsters being bombed there is no reason to have monsters in the movie at all.

If you have 2 hours and nothing to do and can't sleep , it might be worth watching. If only to put you to sleep. The first Monsters was fantastic, this I'm sorry to say is not.

Basically it's a US against Middle East war movie with a few monsters thrown in. It felt like the monsters were there just to look like they could do graphics and or create the sequel.

They honestly felt like they were getting in the way of the war film! Nothing at all like the first monsters movie, even with a bigger budget.

The film seamed to go on and on and there was very little plot. The friend I went with fell asleep twice and that was in a packed Premier screening!

Thank goodness we got free tickets to watch it in Nottingham last night as neither of us would want to buy them.

I was not really a fan of the first movie; however it was intriguing and nicely setup; by the end it was just a love story. This one has better budget but aside from more monsters but it is not used properly.

There are more monsters but always in the distance and almost no interaction with the characters. There is the Jordan desert but the movie is basically a war movie; with unlikable characters a lot of screaming and crying and madness but nothing really interesting happens and the movie becomes too long and irritating by the middle so the last hour is really painful to sit through.

If you expect a payoff for the last hour; forget it. Nothing really is clarified or anything surprising occurs. It is even worse that the movie is not even clear why is going.

There are some pro-war moments on the beginning; then tries to show the lack of communication between cultures and languages; later begin a strong anti Arab statement with Muslim terrorists at it worst; but few minutes later a school bus full of dead kids; product of US Air Force attacks to kill a monster and a very nice Bedouin tribe contradicts the previous statements to finally turn to the madness and lack of real intelligence of the Army every dead monster become thousands of new ones; but it seems nobody found that yet.

Nothing is quite original and everything has been show far better and clear before. It is obvious there is some anti-war message in all these; but it is never fully supported.

In brief; it might had been a good idea but is poorly written and developed so do not lose your time. It is not fun at all. It was our last day, so for those last few hours we needed to forget about what was coming.

They have begun to fully take over the entire planet and now with the US military using all of its resources to fight them off they now have to contend with a new type of insurgency.

I will start by saying that I remember seeing the first one, thinking it was a little slow, but it's been so long all I remember about it is the cheesy ending.

I had the same expectations for this one. I was wrong. While I though this one was a little better it was still pretty slow moving and was really missing something the first one had In terms of war movies this one is pretty decent, the problem with it is that every so often a monster would pop up out of nowhere, presumably to remind you the movie is called monsters.

Some movies are deceiving because of the trailers released, they seem funny and are really dramas, etc This is really just another US vs Taliban movie, with an occasional out of place monster thrown in.

Overall, a movie much like Battle LA, if there were no aliens in that movie. I give this a C. MoviesReviews 14 March Story: Monsters: Dark Continent starts with narration from Michael Parkes Keeley a reluctant solider who explains that the monsters have started to spread destroying cities through the Middle East, where the new Infected Zone is.

Frater Harris is a sniper who has completed his mission before making his swift getaway back to the US base. We learn how the unit all has each other's back and will fight anyone to protect each other.

Drugs, booze and hookers this must mean we are having a leaving party because that is what everyone does right?

Well that was a painful excuse to show boobs in a war based film. Now for the real story to start, we are now following the helicopter assault of a heard of giant monsters which is quickly completed.

Frater and Forrest Pinnock run the base and give the new recruits the rules on how to survive the situation.

We follow the soldiers on basic missions around towns as we witness the effects of war not just on with the monsters but with the terrorists. The unit has been on plenty of patrols without seeing much action before they get a mission to locate a group of missing soldiers.

When the convoy gets hit, the mission changes to one of survival against a human enemy as well as a monster threat. Frater, Michael, Inkelaar and Frankie are the four surviving members of the unit who have to try and stay ahead of the enemy, but aren't very successful.

Before long Frater and Michael are left alone, captured by the enemy they have to escape while the enemy is dealing with a monster attack.

Monsters: Dark Continent moves the action to a different continent and never explains how the monsters ended up in that location considering the first one being set in Mexico.

The most part of this film is a dreadfully boring war story that just has monsters on the outside of it, I am willing to say I don't even know what the point of having the monsters in this film actually is.

The war side of the story has been done so many times it offers nothing to the genre and ends up ruining anything the first film created. I personally think this will be one of the worst stories of the year.

Johnny ends up being a very generic soldier who has been at war too long. Sam fills the generic rookie soldier and doesn't make an impact in the role.

Director Review: Tom Green — Tom doesn't do the original film any justice and gives us one of the most misleading films of the year.

Avoid Best Part: The monsters all look very real. Worst Part: Too Long and no monster action. What Could Have Been Better? Overall: Very disappoint sequel to one of the best low budget films of recent years.

Rating 25 Check out more reviews at moviesreviews ArchonCinemaReviews 7 April The beauty of the original Monsters was its profound statement, Dark Continent satisfies the original naysayer's with action, and not much else.

The initial film Monsters was a profound parable about humanity and its interactions with one another that used an 'alien invasion' as a mirror for this introspection.

It is an independent film I adore and can not recommend enough. Four years later, with seemingly no connection to the original's genius creator Gareth Edwards, Monsters: Dark Continent is released, with absolutely no relation to the film in both scope or talent.

Though the term 'derivative' does not imply subservience in its definition, quite often it is used as a descriptor for inferiority, and Monsters: Dark Continent warrants the adjective.

When I first learned of a sequel to Monsters, I was aghast, for the narrative had been told in its entirety.

When I saw the trailer, I was mortified of the bastardization of the beautiful film into Hollywood action drivel.

With the scope of potential from its predecessor being a peak of perfection to the lows of my expectations of pure garbage, Monsters: Dark Continent falls somewhere in the middle but certainly closer to trash.

In truth, Dark Continent tries to be like its original in using the alien invasion to be an allegory for the war efforts in the middle east.

Unfortunately it feels terribly superficial and contrived. There is no beauty in the story telling of Dark Continent. The dialogue is poor and voice overs are used constantly to convey the narrative rather than creative artistry.

Monsters: Dark Continent is neither philosophical nor intelligent in the manner of its originator.

Writer and director Tom Green tries to speak of the war but it is in a very ignorant and uninformed perspective that is neither deep or even unique.

Please check out our website for full reviews of all the recent releases. When you watch a movie, when you go into a cinema or search, download, buy any movie, than you are looking for a certain kind of movie a certain genre at that moment, at that time.

When you see title that comes along with any associations of a horror movie than you don't expect a comedy, unless it is a parody or so.

But you can read that in a preview or see that from many small parts, like commercial, posters, etc. Here in this movie, I still don't know what I have watched.

It is more or less a try to put a war conflict situation combined with a sci-fi background and a today's Afghanistan war, culture etc.

Conflict, into a movie. A try to show a social conflict but there are so many way better movie like this on the market out there. The movie has no beginning and no end.

The only credits I can give for this movie is the making. The scenes are good, the clothing, wearing's, the monsters those few which actually have not a big part in this movie at all.

So at the end this is a complete waste of time and if you don't want to spent time after seeing the movie to think about all the little, stupid and no logical scenes and parts of the movie and shaking your head, whenever you think back of it, then do something better with your time.

I don't understand why people give this movie and the standalone prequel so much hate. Who wants yet another monster disaster movie shoved in your face?

Both Monsters movies heavily focus on human interaction and the development of the main characters when put in extreme circumstances.

With regards this film specifically - what the main characters go through mentally could easily be mirrored by actual soldiers overseas today but the fact that the main enemy is not of this world, puts a different and interesting perspective on war.

Yet what I think Monsters is trying to say, is that the truth is still the same. This movie is littered with ambiguity and symbolism - do the aliens symbolize terrorism or something else altogether?

Who knows. The point is, this movie lets you make up your own mind without giving you any definitive answers - contrary to most films today, that plainly dictate what the audience should think or feel.

Monsters is absolutely stunning visually and has a soundtrack to match. I think it's only downfall, and that of its predecessor, is how it was advertised.

Maybe this was done on purpose but I think it is the main cause of the majority of its bad reviews. If you want to go watch an action packed disaster movie, don't bother watching.

And definitely don't bother writing a bad review. It's boring. This movie is NOT a sci-fi movie. The cinematography is nice.

Acting is OK. But the movie has Zero plot and just doesn't go anywhere. The main problem is with the story or lack thereof. The movie suggests scifi since the monsters supposedly come from outer space.

But this movie does nothing to talk about where the monsters come from and what their plan is or anything like that.

The monsters seem more like African Elephants moving around in large herds - who make whale like sounds. This movie deserves to be a horror movie coz its a horrible waste of your precious time.

Avoid at all costs. The first movie was bad, this is worse! I started feeling annoyed after only watching the first 10 minutes.

These 4 young men were like little kids and I just hope the Army doesn't really have men with this type of mentality. The movie really had nothing to do with monsters.

They were only put there to make the movie more interesting. It centers more these men and the war. Yes, kill a few monsters and jump up and down with joy.

Some scenes were a little shocking and the scene with the dog fighting a baby alien while these uneducated dead heads watched and cheered was something that I thought shouldn't have been included in the movie.

Especially when the poor dog gets killed by the alien and then some thug shoots the Alien. The acting wasn't too bad but I felt it went a little over board.

I was hoping the film would finish earlier than it's 2 hours or so. I was getting fed up with the war and wanted more of the Monsters but disappointingly, I had to see through gun fire, screaming and nonsense.

The title really has nothing to do with the movie. Waste of time unless you like war films, people firing guns at each other and a story line which to me didn't make much sense.

Sminthian1 6 June I liked the first one and was hoping that they were going to continue and explain more about the monsters. There seems to be a different kind of monsters in this one, and they don't really explain it at all.

This is made out to be mostly a war movie. Humans have been knocked off the top of the food chain, with disparate communities struggling for survival.

American soldiers are being sent abroad to protect US interests from the Monsters, but the war is far from being won. View More. I am surprised for the production quality.

It was comparable to those big productions, so no doubt the visuals played its part accurately. Then what makes this film bad? Well, the story is the biggest issue here.

It is a confusion screenplay, not for the viewers, but seems for the writers. Looks they don't know how to develop and end it with their decent opening.

It was more focused on the military operation than conflict between the man and the monsters. How come when monsters taking over the earth is not considered a threat, but fig View Edit History.

Login to edit. Keyboard Shortcuts. Login to report an issue. You need to be logged in to continue.

- Review: MONSTERS: DARK CONTINENT Deutsch Am The Old Hag Syndrome - IMDb Bilder Zum Ausdrucken, Gute Filme, Filmposter, Coole. immobilien-sachverstand.eu: Monsters - Dark Continent [dt. durch das finstere Zentrum des Monster-Territoriums in den Wüsten des Mittleren Ostens auf. Alien () - IMDb. Monsters – Dark Continent SF-Kriegsdrama // „Monsters“ kam aus dem Nichts. Das mit Methoden des Guerrilla Filmmaking gedrehte.

Monsters Dark Continent Imdb หนังใกล้เคียง Video

Monsters: Dark Continent Official Trailer #2 (2014) - Sci-Fi Monster Movie HD

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

0 Gedanken zu „Monsters Dark Continent Imdb

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.